I follow several spiritual blogs and – despite my own declared atheism – find them generally fascinating. After all, the dilemmas we face are the same for all, regardless of the spiritual solution we find to make our peace with them.
In all of the discussion of god’s will and man’s responsibility (often paired with the difficulty of the challenges to be overcome in the pain and suffering of the world) I find little mention of a simple fact.
Willpower, and thus moral will, is a muscle. Like all muscles, it responds to stimulus and exercise. This is why we teach our children to share at a very early age, to respect others. We know that the practice they gain in this monumental task of viewing the ‘others’ welfare as inseparable from our own, is time well spent. Kindness to a puppy does generalize, as the law has recently acknowledged in the US with the increased emphasis on criminalizing cruelty to animals. Just as those who practice evil by beating/harming defenseless animals often graduate to beating/harming defenseless humans – kindness practiced in consideration of the welfare of a bumble bee helps acclimate the human heart to the practice of compassion and kindness to fellow humans.
At the root of this will-to-good is connectedness, which it appears we once had in abundance. In many cultures throughout the world man saw himself as brother to crow, to wolf My Christian readers may forgive me for the observation that, in the west, the heart of the disconnect was excused by the religious teaching that nature and man were distinct, separable, and nature was to be used for man’s ease. As I read the many contradictions in the various chapters of the Bible – I notice that this same God ALSO made both nature and man to cohabit in the same space, to live together in the common good.
The other disruptor was that other western god, Science, which feeds off hubris and, while telling us we are inseparable with nature and cannot live alone, contradictorily is continually pushing us towards the attempt to do so.
Both Science and this version of the western God share responsibility: Science as hubris, religion as apologist for wrong-action.
Where is will-power, the moral will to save ourselves, our planet, the whole of this intricate world/creation we evolved in/were gifted with?
It isn’t just city folk who are missing the connection between man and nature. I grew up in an area where kids couldn’t safely enter the growing fields because of the prevalence of chemical poisons. Nature was the enemy-with-many-faces: insects, blights, molds, disease, birds, critters. Better to stay locked up in the house.
The rift is healing, one field at a time. Many of our ancestors simply burned a forest when the fertility of their fields gave out – some subsistence cultures in the world still do.
But the collective world knowledge can now reunite us with the fabled past, that distant memory of fecund soil, bird song, bubbling springs. Just as a child needs to work hard in order to learn to walk - falling, pulling himself up, and falling again; we need to work hard to get our collective feet under us and pull ourselves into a new world.
It’s still possible. But time is running out. Do we have the will to make it happen or will we endlessly avoid the truth, letting greed and sloth choose our path - one Chicken McNugget at a time?
Monday, April 28, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
What a terrific post! I really enjoy reading your writing -- it flows so smoothly and is so honest.
Willpower, respect, and responsibility. This reminds me of a debate I've had lately with a dear friend from my college days. Here is what I wrote recently... perhaps you'll find it interesting:
Oh, yes. The Catholic religious (just an example) are supposed to live celibate lives. The word itself is confused with chastity which means a pure life, virginity. Celibacy is defined as the passing up of unlawful or immoral sexual activity. But it does not describe a chaste life. The church will say to you, "He remained celibate [unmarried], although he engaged in sexual intercourse." Only they could think this is clear. If you are normal, it is great reading for an institution dayroom. If you prance on the ridges of words, celibacy does not rule out sex. If they said chaste, they would mean absolute abstinence. Use of the word celibacy leaves a person with a life of their own, while letting the definitions get out there and mix the whole thing up. Giving oneself up to honor God is the announced reason, but if you're Catholic, it's real estate. For centuries, the bishops, priests, and deacons were married and had families and lived on sweeping lands. They left the property to their children. One of the first and most urgent proclamations from one of the earliest gatherings of this religion, a council of Elvira, Spain (circa 300) commanded that nobody could have wives. If they could not have wives, then there would be no children and, as there were no heirs, all land would revert to Rome. The church would steal it, but at least land would not go to some rat children. It took a little time. Seven centuries worth of dissenting behavior had thousands of children who, after weeping bitterly at the funeral of their father, a bishop, went strolling about estates they had just inherited. Pope Benedict something-or-other in the year ten-something, decreed that priests could not marry and that their children could not inherit. The results of their forced celibacy show it has been an act of madness for the church. It leaves priests without wives and with err.. other reasonable relief. Or with an eye on the boys' choir. Wolves, I say.
Just thought you might find it interesting.
Blessings!
Lacy
I thought this a terrific post as well and will come back to it for you are saying a lot in it. your idea of the moral muscle was initially odd to my mind, not because it is odd but because, flabbily, I tend not to think in those terms. It sounds so much like my Christian headmaster of fifty years ago, but is meant in a different way. In rural Jamaica, it was part of every child's life to have a chicken or later a goat to tend.
I have in my own life been reconnecting with nature, as you know, and it has been till you have opened my eyes a sort of religious belief in me that somehow it was possible for anyone to reconnect in the same way. But I see that it requires practice, exercise. Yesterday I heard on the radio of an experiment starting in British schools where young children will be taught empathy. Which is a great part of it.
Your argument is wonderfully cogent, coherent and of immediate relevance to us all.
To quote Razor, "What a terrific post! I really enjoy reading your writing -- it flows so smoothly and is so honest."
I rarely discuss religion, it's so personal. For us...me...it's a part of our waking, walking life, it's a way of life, not in an obsessive manner, it's just there, that's all.
When folks go wrong here, people tend to say, 'they ain't got religion'. Today, that's what you'll hear often, so many now don't have a set of code to live by, no will power no moral will...actually, no fathers to teach them, and mothers who themselves are children, and barely literate.
thanks, lacy, for offering that up.
vincent - here in the states there has been much human progress made by using human inmates to re-train dogs who would otherwise be euthanized. The consistency in practice, the repetition, the knowing that they are rebuilding a life seems to have a transformative effect on those doing the work. Better, those participating in the program have a very low rate of recidivism. Buddhism teaches that compassion is a practice, and I believe they are right. The practice in rural Jamaica is wonderful. Here, we have 4-H while not as simple and inclusive, offers much of the same experience of responsibility, empathy and success.
gg - ahh, the children with no one to teach them. this breaks my heart. It is a problem through so much of the world. Your comments on religion interest me; perhaps, through living it so completely, it removes the urge for debate, for spiritual hair-splitting.
Hayden, I have taken the liberty of quoting from your post in my latest. I'm sure you won't mind and I've linked back here too.
Yes, yes. Morality seems to be fading fast. YOu constantly have someone in the local paper who has stolen from his employer. It is never surprising or shocking to hear anyone from any walk of life has been fooling us all.
I once heard Stephen Covey (I think) say that nothing will change until we each practice scrupulous principles and values. (These are not his exact words just my vague remembrance of what he said.) For example, if you are undercharged at the grocery store and you know it make the correction. If your children are with you they will see this example. The clerk at the store will see it. Ripple effect. I think he's right but I don't know how easy it is for people who believe they are being taken by corporations that run the store. I imagine that part of living your values would be not shopping at places whose ideals don't match your own. Inconvient yes but certainly worth the trouble in regards to being a principled human being as you yourself are always SUCH a good example.
These recent posts are great -- especially this one. I am totally fascinated with the disconnect that has happened between spirituality and The Source, especially since early spiritual practices were all about the connectedness of all things, and the worship of the natural elements. How did paganism become such a dirty word? (Rhetorical question... unfortuantely :)
Post a Comment